Risk Managed Strategy Funds

AS SEEN IN

Lord Abbett: Should Investors Be Troubled By The U.S. Yield Curve?

March 30, 2022

The Fed has finally hiked. What can the shape of the yield curve tell us‒and not tell us‒about the state of the economy?

 

After months of anticipation, the U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed) has finally begun what is expected to be a series of numerous hikes to the target of their overnight fed funds rate. The rate is highly scrutinized because interest rates have an important impact on the economy, as well as serving as a central barometer for the overall health of the economy. As vital as interest rates are, however, it is important to consider what they can tell us, as well as what they can’t.

The Shape Explained

One closely followed signal is the shape of the U.S. yield curve, which shows how long-term interest rates differ from short-term rates. In general, when the curve is flat (meaning that long-term yields are similar to short-term yields), it suggests that the market believes future economic growth may be low relative to current growth, or even negative. It also makes long-term borrowing cheaper for both consumers and businesses. Finally, because the U.S. rates market is such a liquid and efficient market, many observers will look at yield curve inversion—that is, when longer rates fall below short-term rates—as a key indicator of an upcoming recession.

However, we note several key points regarding this relationship: first, yield curve shape does not actually cause recessions, although it may help to signal them; second, this indicator is far from perfect, as there have been numerous false signals in the past, with a varying amount of time until a recession may occur; and finally, it is important to consider which part of the yield curve is sending the signal, as some are more reliable than others.

As stated earlier, the shape of the yield curve does not cause recessions. In fact, all else being equal, a flat or inverted yield curve tends to boost economic activity, as borrowing costs fall for consumers and businesses alike. However, this shape does receive a lot of attention every time the yield curve flattens, as such a move is often associated with recessions. As we have written recently, a flattening of that yield difference is quite normal when the Fed is hiking. Indeed, such a move can generally be associated with economic health, as it implies that future economic expectations are similar to current economic activity, and that investors are not demanding a significant premium for uncertainty. And when that relationship inverts, it suggests the market believes that rates will fall in the future, likely due to sagging economic activity.

But in making such an assessment, we also must ask what part of the yield curve are we considering and how far in the future? And to which short-term rates are we comparing things? The oft-cited metric of two-year U.S. Treasury yields versus 10-year U.S. Treasury yields, it turns out, is both vague and unreliable. A better indicator, the difference between very short-term yields and medium-term Treasuries, such as three-month and five-year U.S. Treasury yields, provides a far more reliable signal for recession risk.

Finding More Reliable Yield Curve Signals

One problem with some yield curve indicators is that they can give false signals. The U.S. economy has experienced four recessions since the last time the Fed had to use policy to battle stubborn inflation—when Chairman Paul Volcker spearheaded a series of hikes in the early 1980s. During that period, the yield difference between two-year Treasuries and 10-year Treasuries has gone from positive to negative seven times—or seven recession signals for only four recessions, including the “successful” inversion prediction of 2019 that likely would have been another false signal without the COVID-19 pandemic.

In addition to false signals, the two-year and 10-year Treasury yield spread inversion tell us very little about when the recession might occur. The handful of correctly predicted recessions have ranged from six months to more than two years after the inversion occurred. For example, the yield curve inverted in January 2006 and stayed inverted for more than two years until the recession of the financial crisis in 2008. There are simply to many factors that determine the yield on a 10-year Treasury for it to tell us anything meaningful about long-term forecasts. However, we can look to a more reliable recession signal if we consider short-term maturities.


Two-year and 10-year Treasury spreads have inverted seven times, while recessions have occurred only four times in that period. Recessions that did occur took between six months to over two years to materialize.


Campbell Harvey, an economist and market researcher, did the original research on yield curve inversion as a recession predictor in the 1980s. However, that research focused on three-month versus five-year Treasury maturities—quite different from the now-popular but ineffective two-year versus 10-year benchmark. The yield spread of those shorter maturities has a far better track record in signaling recessions. As we can see below, every recession (shaded gray) has been preceded by an inversion of this rate, with about a 12- to 18-month interval until the recession officially begins.

Figure 1. This U.S. Yield Curve Historically Has Been a More Reliable Predictor of Recessions

Yield curve differential between the five-year U.S. Treasury note and the three-month U.S. Treasury bill rate, January 1, 1983–March 15 2022
The shape of the more reliable U.S. Yield Curve
Source: U.S. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Shaded areas indicate recessionary periods. Yield curve represents differential between three-month and five-year U.S. Treasury yields. The historical data are for illustrative purposes only, do not represent the performance of any specific portfolio managed by Lord Abbett or any particular investment, and are not intended to predict or depict future results. Investors may experience different results. Past performance is not a reliable indicator or guarantee of future results.
Economic forecasting is an imperfect science, and markets can get it wrong, too. But there is a lot of useful information priced into the massive and liquid interest rate market, if we consider relevance and context. Recessions typically require a combination of economic vulnerability and some form of shock to the system. It took a forced shutdown of the economy during COVID to create an actual recession when the economy was healthy, and that recession proved to be extremely short-lived. We can note the contrast with the 2006-2008 period, when markets—including the prolonged inversions—showed signs of significant imbalance in the economy, yet it took a catalyst of collapsing housing to trigger a recession. Neither of those situations look remotely like today’s economy and market, in which the predictive three-month and five-year Treasury spread is high and rising—far from the “danger zone” of inversion. It is understandable that investors are nervous, given overall market volatility, high inflation, and a hiking Fed, with geopolitical turmoil and commodity price shocks from the conflict in Ukraine. Investors may reasonably wonder if the surge in oil prices could be the shock that sends us spiraling into recession. However, the actual yield curve recession signal is sending a message of economic strength, not impending recession. A quick look at traditional recession causes—rising unemployment and overcapacity in the system relative to demand—also confirm this positive market signal. The labor market is as tight as it has been in many decades, while the biggest issue the U.S. economy faces is excess demand, not excess supply. Recent years have shown us that anything can happen, of course, but investors should not be concerned about an imminent recession just because of a misunderstood interest rate signal.

 

Source: https://www.lordabbett.com/en-us/financial-advisor/insights/markets-and-economy/should-investors-be-troubled-by-the-u-s–yield-curve-.html